Data Borders: How New Data Protection Laws Are Redrawing the Map of Global Scientific Collaboration in 2025
How International Data Protection Laws Are Shaping Global Scientific Collaboration—A 2025 Perspective
In recent developments, major European research funders have suspended collaborative projects with China due to concerns over China’s Data Security Law. This law restricts the sharing of “important data” with overseas partners without government approval, impacting joint research in critical fields such as health and environmental studies. This raises urgent questions about the future of international scientific cooperation.
Background on China’s Data Security Law
China’s Data Security Law has a broad definition of “important data” and requires security clearance from the Cyberspace Administration of China before any cross-border data sharing can occur. This law aims to protect national security by controlling the flow of data across its borders, but it also poses significant challenges for international research collaborations.
Impact on International Research
The restrictions imposed by China’s Data Security Law have led to the suspension of new co-funded projects between European agencies and China. This has potential consequences for global research, especially in areas like pandemic response and environmental monitoring. The halt in collaboration could slow down progress in these critical fields, where international cooperation is essential.
Broader Implications for Data Protection Officers
For data protection professionals working in multinational organizations or research institutions, these developments mean navigating complex compliance challenges. There is a growing need for robust cross-border data governance to ensure that data sharing complies with varying international regulations.
The Balance Between Security and Collaboration
There is an inherent tension between national data security interests and the global need for open scientific collaboration. Experts stress the importance of responsible and safe data sharing to address global challenges. Finding a balance between these competing interests is crucial for the future of international research.
Comparative Perspective
China’s approach to data protection can be compared with the GDPR in Europe and other international data protection frameworks. Navigating these multiple regulatory environments is complex, but necessary for fostering international collaboration while ensuring data security.
Conclusion
This issue is timely and highly relevant for data protection officers, researchers, and policymakers. It offers an opportunity to inform audiences about the real-world impact of evolving data protection laws on international cooperation and provides practical insights for navigating these changes.